Physiological Strength and Body Reaction after Training at the Male 2500m Oxygen Deprivation Chamber

Over the last few decades many athletes and coaches have used altitude training in various forms to help improve performance at altitude and/or at sea level. The traditional approach to altitude training was for athletes to live and train at moderate altitude. The effects of this form of stimulus on endurance performance have been researched extensivel [1]. A recent approach has been for athletes to live and sleep at altitude and train near sea level, the so-called live hightrain low (LHTL) method or the opposite live lowtrain high (LLTH) method, to live and sleep at sea level and train at altitude [2 & 3]. Because the geography of many countries does not allow LHTL or LLTH, other strategies have been developed for athletes, such as being briefly exposed to hypoxia. Intermittent hypoxic exposure with (IHE) or without (IHT) exercise training is based on the assumption that brief exposure to hypoxia (minutes to hours) is sufficient to stimulate EPO release, and ultimately increase red blood cell (RBC) concentration and to induce peripheral modifications in skeletal muscle that in turn might increase performance [2 & 4].


Introduction
Over the last few decades many athletes and coaches have used altitude training in various forms to help improve performance at altitude and/or at sea level. The traditional approach to altitude training was for athletes to live and train at moderate altitude. The effects of this form of stimulus on endurance performance have been researched extensivel [1]. A recent approach has been for athletes to live and sleep at altitude and train near sea level, the so-called live hightrain low (LHTL) method or the opposite live lowtrain high (LLTH) method, to live and sleep at sea level and train at altitude [2 & 3]. Because the geography of many countries does not allow LHTL or LLTH, other strategies have been developed for athletes, such as being briefly exposed to hypoxia. Intermittent hypoxic exposure with (IHE) or without (IHT) exercise training is based on the assumption that brief exposure to hypoxia (minutes to hours) is sufficient to stimulate EPO release, and ultimately increase red blood cell (RBC) concentration and to induce peripheral modifications in skeletal muscle that in turn might increase performance [2 & 4].
Altitude and hypoxic training are common among endurance athletes and recommended by many coaches for potential benefits during subsequent competition at or near sea-level. As altitudein creases, atmospheric pressure decreases, and although the fractional concentration of oxygen remains the same (20.9%), the partial pressure of oxygen decreases, reducing the amount of oxygen available for delivery to exercising tissues [5]. Like many different training strategies, not all individuals are expected to respond equally to training at altitude. Considerable variation in the individual response to altitude training has been documented both in terms of physiological variables such as red cell and Hb mass as well as endurance performance [6]. Individual differences in EPO production play a role in determining how RBC volume and Hb mass change in response to altitude and hypoxic training. [7] Plasma EPO concentration increases in RBC mass and total blood volume were found to differ between athletes who improved their 3 km run performance versus those who did not in a retrospective analysis [8]. With the above analyzes showing that the effect of exercise at high altitudes with no oxygen environment is not consistent with the viewpoint, athletes still use the simulated assumptions of elevation to improve Sports performance to achieve high performance. [9] Therefore n g porch this study empirically tested the impact of environment assumed elevation 2500m with

Research and Methods
(

Experimental Design
Based on the scientific basis, professional characteristics and equipment system in the division of oxygen, the author builds a program running on the treadmill to apply to subjects studied    and (C) participate in the study after 6 weeks. Table 3 shows the difference was statistically significant variation physiological and ability to absorb maximum oxygen elite male sprinters in aerobic activities. Table 4 shows the variation biochemical differences bring operational performance capability for endurance athletes ( with the original test. However, when analyzing the differences between the two groups (H) and (C) statistical significance was HRmin 3.32% and VO2max 3.3% (p <0.01). As a result of the analysis, the impact of the environment and exercise program has significantly improved aerobic performance for group (H) athletes compared to group (C) shown. The difference is statistically significant across groups, more specifically in HRmin and VO2max (Table 4).

Discussion and Conclusion
The study showed that the effectiveness of the program with 3 intensity cyclist (100% -90% peak power) for 7 weeks at 3000 m simulated height and VO2max ability of the pretest team it is better than grouping near sea level. [11] showing the effect of 5 weeks of training in a 2500m elevated presumptive environment, improved aerobic performance compared with exercise near sea level, modified but not this is consistent with the findings of the study, which is consistent with [11], as RBC did not increase after 6 weeks of training. This study is also consistent with the study by [4], which is stimulated by the Erythropoietin (EPO) hormone. [12] As EPO plays an important role in stimulating red blood cell production, EPO is mainly synthesized by the pertibular fibroblasts of the renal cortex and liver, like a reaction resistant hypoxic state [4,13].
The most important finding of this work states that a 6-weekly intermittent hypoxic training protocol with high intensity intervals (3 x 3 group x 5min bouts at 90% of VO2max-hyp) is an effective training means for improving aerobic capacity at sea level.