The Colloid Vibration Potential Effect from Silica Suspensions Using Electroacoustic Spectroscopy

The concept of Ion Vibration Potential (IVP) by applying an ultrasonic wave to electrolytic ions has its origin back to Debye who initially predicted this phenomenon as a sound wave propagates through an electrolyte suspension [1]. The IVP will be generated because of the passage of the external acoustic wave interacting with the ionic source. This particular potential arises due to the difference in cations (negatively charged ions) and anions (positively charged ions) mass and in addition, it will accompany the applied ultrasound wave, having the same frequency but lag in phase. The generated potential can be detected either as a current, Ion Vibration Current (IVI) or Voltage (IVP) between two points in space. Herman’s and Rutgers extended this terminology to colloidal systems, and consequently, Yeager and Zana performed the first experimental work on silica suspensions [2-7]. Eventually, the term was more generalized to Colloid Vibration Potential (CVP). The relative signal magnitude of CVP is much stronger than IVP; typically, a factor of 20 and the value is in order of few hundreds of mV or few μA depending on measuring the desired voltage or current, both IVP and CVP are special cases of Ultrasound Vibration Potential (UVP).


Introduction
The concept of Ion Vibration Potential (IVP) by applying an ultrasonic wave to electrolytic ions has its origin back to Debye who initially predicted this phenomenon as a sound wave propagates through an electrolyte suspension [1]. The IVP will be generated because of the passage of the external acoustic wave interacting with the ionic source. This particular potential arises due to the difference in cations (negatively charged ions) and anions (positively charged ions) mass and in addition, it will accompany the applied ultrasound wave, having the same frequency but lag in phase. The generated potential can be detected either as a current, Ion Vibration Current (IVI) or Voltage (IVP) between two points in space. Herman's and Rutgers extended this terminology to colloidal systems, and consequently, Yeager and Zana performed the first experimental work on silica suspensions [2][3][4][5][6][7]. Eventually, the term was more generalized to Colloid Vibration Potential (CVP). The relative signal magnitude of CVP is much stronger than IVP; typically, a factor of 20 and the value is in order of few hundreds of mV or few µA depending on measuring the desired voltage or current, both IVP and CVP are special cases of Ultrasound Vibration Potential (UVP).
CVP is the creation of an electric field caused be the applied ultrasonic field due to the displacement of the surface charged particles. Usually, charges are carried by the particle in a suspension, and it is surrounded by oppositely charged counter ions facilitating an overall neutrality of the entire suspension. A layer, known as the Double Layer (DL), contains the surrounding charge, which is spherically distributed surrounding the particles. The external ultrasonic force is categorized as being a pressure gradient force and displaces the charge carriers (the particle and counter ions) from their equilibrium position causing a polarization, which is treated as a charge-dipole. The time varying ultrasonic field results in a generated alternating electrical field, which is measured by two electrodes placed across the suspension.
Here ϕ is the volume fraction of particles, ρ is the mass density of the suspension, Δρ is the density difference between the particles and the fluid, the parameter µ d is the dynamic mobility of the particles and K* is the complex conductivity.

Methodology
The experiments were conducted applying the Leeds standard different concentrations of 0.5% by weight (wt.), 1% by wt. and 5% by wt. The principle of detecting the CVP signal experimentally is similar as described for the case of IVP [44]. Further contribution has been made to the generation of the CVP signal [45]. In Figure 1 the schematics provides insights to the principle and mechanism of creation of the CVP effect. The arrows indicate the relative displacement of anions and cations upon action of an external ultrasonic wave, and as observed the former is displaced to a greater extent than the latter. The net result is that point A will have more negative potential and conversely point B more positive potential.
By placing electrodes at two different terminals of the ultrasonic wave, the CVP signal magnitude is detected.

Results and Discussion
The obtained CVP magnitude results are addressed in three different parts corresponding to the three experimental parameters: the concentration of the suspension, the particle size distribution and the excitation frequency. The CVP signal is generated at the  Figure 2. Both electrical pulses are comprised of 6 cycles, and they appear at the entrance and exit of the colloidal source at the respective cling film surfaces. Further information related to generation of the current is worked out in literature [46][47][48]. The excitation voltage of 9.9V peak to peak is read on the oscilloscope and a gain of 40dB provides an actual value of 990V.

Effect of Concentration
The detected CVP magnitude results are displayed for five different silica dioxide colloidal suspensions with different principal particle size distribution 35, 70, 100, 165 and 190nm respectively for the case of 1MHz transducer in Figure 3, and the error bars are well presented ranging up to 5%. The CVP magnitude is measured by varying the particle concentration and the effect of it is strongly pronounced providing the smallest signal magnitude for a value of 0.5% and consequently the highest for 5%.
The relative significant change in the signal strength is obtained for concentration higher than 1%. The CVP magnitude is clearly At lower concentrations it is difficult to mirror the significant difference in the signal strength, for instance it is observed that silica 70nm provides strongest signal for the case of 2MHz transducer, reflecting inconsistency linked at lower concentrations.
All measurements have a tolerance so possible errors are incorporated in measurements for low concentration such as 0.5 and 1%. Thus, the effect is enhanced for higher concentrations and is in good agreement with previous study reported in the literature [41]. It is appropriate to look at the conductivity effect since the CVP magnitude is inversely proportional to the conductivity.

Conductivity increases as a function of the concentration and CVP
is descending as a function of the conductivity but it turns out the concentration effect is more predominant compared to the conductivity as a result of the pronounced overall increment of the CVP magnitude. Our results are also quantitatively comparable to the measurements reported in the following report [38].

Effect of Particle Size Distribution
The effect of principal particle size distribution displays an interesting feature. The CVP magnitude increases from 35nm up to 100nm and surprisingly there is an abruptly change as the signal magnitude is significantly descending at particle size slightly greater than 100nm. The tendency is prominent for the case of 165nm and culminates at 190nm. At first sight, the origin of the unexpectedly and discontinuous behaviour is explained and identified in terms of the surface charge. Further observation indicates that at lower concentration (0.5%) the signal strength variation is not clearly pronounced and as discussed above potential errors are linked with the ultra-weak signal and incorporated within the measurements ( Figure 4).

Figure 4:
The CVP signal magnitude versus the particle size distribution measured using a 1MHz transducer.

Am J Biomed Sci & Res Copy@ Jafar I Khan
For the case of the 0.5MHz transducer, the signal magnitude shows the expected behaviour for both the 5 and 0.5% wt. samples.
The odd observation is present for the case of 1% wt. providing signal magnitude of 100nm lower than both 70 and 165nm and in addition, the latter size has the peak value of all samples. The offset is calculated with the difference being (0.008-0.005) mA = 0.003mA, which gives about 38%. It seems quite large but be aware that detecting these weak values are extreme challenging and the deviation can be large which is experienced during the actual measurements. For the case of 1MHz transducer, the results are relatively satisfying for both 1 and 5% concentrations. The remarkable situation is seen for a single point at 100nm for 0.5% concentration, which is slightly lower than the CVP magnitude for 70nm. Measurements obtained at an excitation frequency of 2MHz is to a large extent quite satisfying except for the case of 165nm that peaks for both 0.5% and 1% concentrations.
The main interpretation of the measurements is that the colloid vibration potential signal magnitude is descending for larger particle size distribution around 165nm. This observation is in good agreement with the findings reported earlier in literature, which points in direction of a decreasing signal magnitude for larger particle size distribution [41]. In that particular study the PSD range was different than in current case, however overall, the effect of PSD is clearly comparable despite the crossings are observed at lower concentrations. The fact is that surface charge plays a vital role in electroacoustic measurements. As the surface area increases the surface charge density becomes smaller, thus at a certain or critical PSD the colloid vibration potential signal drops.
With this, we infer that the critical particle size range is 100-165nm and 190nm for our case. It is well documented that CVP signal magnitude increases from small particle size to larger particle size and then drops gradually for particle size greater than 165nm.
This effect has been demonstrated using three different transducer frequencies thus providing a relative consistency throughout the measurements.
In order to evaluate the discontinuous behaviour, we consider the double layer for a spherical particle. The potential for a flat symmetric double layer is given in terms of the particle radius a, and it decays exponentially. The surface charge is a function of the Stern potential, which is frequency dependent of the concentration of a suspension. For large ka the surface charge is directly proportional to the Stern potential and thus the concentration. On the other hand, in the case of small ka it has a form, which is simultaneously proportional to the Stern Potential and inversely proportional to the particle radius. Thus, the relationship between surface charge and particle size is incorporated in this formalism. For relatively small PSD, in order of nanometres, the surface charge increases, and is proportional to the concentration. In contrast, as the particle size distribution is increased a deficit appears in surface charge.
The discontinuity in the CVP signal magnitude is thus intuitively explained by this effect. Analogously the conductivity effect, as discussed for the case of different concentrations, is weaker compared to the particle size effect so the net result of increment in CVP magnitude is predominantly due to the latter.

Effect of Frequency
The data is also displayed for three different transducer frequencies for all samples in Figure 5, and additionally, an inset is presented to provide insights into the samples yielding lower signal magnitude. As it appears the frequency spectrum is relatively narrow across 0.5-2MHz due to the limitations of the equipment.
Our measurements reflect that CVP magnitude is descending with  In the end, we discuss the effect of attenuation of the acoustic wave influencing the measurements. To this end, pioneering work has been conducted measuring ultrasound attenuation from several systems [38]. Attenuation of ultrasound is frequency dependent and for our case this is additionally linked to the measurement circuit associated with the transducer, current amplifier and of the electromagnetic field. Typically, attenuation at this relatively narrow

American Journal of Biomedical Science & Research
Copy@ Jafar I Khan frequency range (0.5-2MHz) is less than 0.1dB for Silica suspensions [38]. Further the attenuation linked to the transducer performance is less than 1dB and finally the attenuation gain from the frequency response of the current amplifier is 2dB in the particular frequency region. The total ultrasound attenuation associated with the CVP measurement is estimated to be 3.1dB. Additional factor causing attenuation of the high frequency electromagnetic field (or current density) inside conductive materials is also called the skin effect, which is frequency dependent.
However, due to the narrow frequency band, for example at a distance of 5mm away from the CVP generation, the current density ratio for the selected CVP signals at 2.0MHz and 0.5MHz is only about 0.99. Consequently, the obtained values provide the total attenuation caused by ultrasound and the measurement circuit of 3.1dB. Finally, having addressed both attenuation mechanisms and their impact, the relative CVP signal increment from 2MHz to 0.5MHz yields a factor of 2.5 for our experimental results This corresponds to a relative increase of 8dB thus it will play a dominant role in the frequency effect presented in Figure 5 compared to the attenuation of 3.1dB.

Conclusion
In summary, we have presented an experimentally electroacoustic technique to investigate the physicochemical properties of different silica suspensions. The measured CVP magnitude is increasing as a function of the colloidal suspension concentration ranging from 1% by wt. to 5%, where the effect is clearly pronounced for the latter case. The relative change in CVP magnitude for the case of 100nm providing the highest signal is a factor of 22.9 and the actual value for this particular PSD is obtained to be 19.9µA. Furthermore, the effect of the PSD on CVP has been investigated and it is evidenced that the magnitude is ascending at smaller PSD but suddenly descends at larger PSD around 110-120nm. The relative change of the descending signal magnitude for this particular particle size distribution is from the peak value to the lowest value providing a difference of 10%. The discontinuous behaviour is explained by considering the surface charge, which decreases as a function of the particle radius at a certain value.
The overall lowest value of the CVP magnitude is detected for a PSD of 190nm with a value of 0.35µA. In addition, the CVP magnitude decreases as a function of the excitation frequency at a relatively narrow spectrum of 0.5-2MHz. The relative difference obtained for the case of 100nm is 40% so a pronounced effect is clearly observed. Attenuation is incorporated in our frequency response measurements and have a slightly higher value than the overall signal drop. As a matter of fact, we have examined three different parameters to investigate the outcome of silica suspensions and our results are relatively in good agreement with existing knowledge. The points emerged in current study can potentially serve for testing of different colloidal systems, in addition, further improvement will establish a pathway to a standard imaging technique to be utilised in medical science.