The Equine Endometrial Microbiome: A Brief Review

Our purpose is to examine an alternative idea to describing the reproductive tract microbiome in the mare. Defining the reproductive tract microflora in any species including the mare lies in the need to be able to determine the physiologic state of the microbiome in healthy patients in order to develop a deeper understanding of the impact dysbiosis can have on overall health. With the background information we have, and the advancement of sequencing techniques at our disposal it may be time to challenge the veterinary dogma of a “sterile uterus” and adjust our clinical practices accordingly.


Introduction
It has been standard dogma that although the vagina is colonized with commensal bacteria, the uterus is maintained as a sterile environment [1] and a failure to eliminate bacteria, sperm and inflammatory products from the uterus post-breeding will result in endometritis and reduced fertility [2]. While relatively more is known about the microbiome of the human reproductive tract, much less is known about the microbial communities residing in the reproductive tract of animals. As with the mare, in cattle it has long been held that bacterial contamination during the periparturient period led to endometritis or metritis in the cow [3].
In all of our farm animal species these dogmata were based on the results from media-based culture systems.
Although culture-based studies have laid out the foundation of our understanding of the uterine microbiota, almost three decades ago there was an indication that culture-based methodologies in identifying microbial populations may underestimate diversity and overestimate the role of culturable bacteria [4]. Focusing on culturable bacteria, often the rarer members of microbial communities, enhances the risk of missing those microbes that are more abundant [5,6]. Recently we completed a study in the canine reproductive tract documenting with 16s rDNA-based metagenomics the presence and diversity of both vaginal and uterine microbiomes at the various stages of the estrous cycle, concluding that both the endometrium and the vagina have rich microbial ecosystems [7]. Additionally, a study utilizing cultureindependent 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) sequencing of the bovine and ovine vaginal microbiota from ectocervicovaginal lavages revealed that cow and ewe vaginal microbiota are unique from previously described vaginal microbial ecosystems [8]. It is clear from these studies that culture-based diagnostic systems miss the great diversity present in both diseased and healthy reproductive tracts and express a need for metagenomic analytics.
We began our metagenomics investigations in the mare to document the underestimation of microbial diversity with common culture methods relative to the presence of microbial DNA using the approach six years ago [9]. This study grew from a study utilizing molecular identification performed by sequencing of PCR products of 16S rDNA using 63F and 1389R primers which suggested separate populations of microbiota between the equine uterus and vagina [10]. Differences were shown between vaginal and uterine The mammalian vagina is known to harbor a rich microbial ecosystem, while the human vaginal microbiome is well-described [17][18][19][20][21][22][23], only a few non-human vaginal microbiomes have been described to date [8,[24][25][26]. The endometrium on the other hand, was considered a sterile environment [1,27] until a few years ago when that paradigm was challenged by the observation that the human placenta harbors a small but diverse microbiome [27,28].
This new view is, however, not without debate [29]. In addition to the human work, a few studies have been performed exploring the microbiome of the bovine and ovine endometrium and placenta [30][31][32][33]. While the microbiota of the cow and ewe were similar, the bovine vaginal microbiome showed greater diversity compared to the ovine and both were considerably different from those reported in the human and non-human primates.
Schnobrich, et al. described "Next Generation Sequencing" (MicroGenDX, formally PathoGenius Laboratory, Lubbock, TX) of samples from 10 clinically normal mares and compared those results to traditional methods of diagnosing infectious endometritis [34]. The main problem with the analyses is that the DNA sequences were compared against a bank of known human and equine pathogens, therefore they did not consider all possible normal non-culturable bacteria that have heretofore been undocumented in the normal microbiota of the mare. At the same time a second abstract was presented very similar to one we published in 2011 [9] wherein uterine fluid samples obtained from mares were subjected to metagenomic DNA sequencing of the l6S rRNA gene.

Conclusion
We conclude from our studies and the literature reviewed, that culture-based systems miss the great diversity present in both diseased and healthy reproductive tracts. Given this diversity, there is much to be studied relative to the intra-microbiota interactions and species-intrinsic factors that may be more relevant to the maintaining a state of balance and health and that an imbalance of these factors maybe more important in the development of uterine disease than the abundance of any given bacterial species.