Volume 14 - Issue 3

Opinion Biomedical Science and Research Biomedical Science and Research CC by Creative Commons, CC-BY

Impact and Future Changes to Breast Cancer Care Due to Covid-19

*Corresponding author: Kennard Kaitlyn, Lankenau Institute for Medical Research, USA.

Received: August 09, 2021; Published: September 30, 2021

DOI: 10.34297/AJBSR.2021.14.001987

Abbreviations: WHO: World Health Organization; SARS-CoV2: Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2; COVID-19: Coronavirus Disease 2019; NCCN: National Comprehensive Cancer Network; ACR: American College of Radiology; ASBrS: American Society of Breast Surgeons; NCT: Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy; CoC: Commission on Cancer

Introduction

A novel coronavirus severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) was identified and the World Health Organization (WHO) termed with illness it caused coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This occurred in late 2019 and was first identified in Wuhan City, Hubei Province, China [1]. By the beginning of March 2020 many restrictions were in place across the United States to decrease transmission of the virus and the disease burden on health systems. These restrictions to contain COVID-19 impacted various aspects of the health systems across the nation and their ability to deliver care. Specifically, the ability of health systems to respond to emergencies, obtain sufficient health care supplies and maintain adequate numbers of health staff were compromised [2,3]. Early in the pandemic, several large United States (US) based medical societies including the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS), the National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers (NAPBC), the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), the Commission on Cancer (CoC) and the American College of Radiology (ACR) collaborated to provide expert opinion regarding how to prioritize patients diagnosed with breast cancer during this time [4]. These recommendations placed patients into different groups based on the acuity of disease and risk of disease progression while evaluating the risk of intervention based on hospital resources and risk of personnel exposure. One main recommendation from this risk stratification schema was the prioritization of surgical intervention for patients completing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) for triple negative and HER2- positive disease. In addition, it was recommended to initiate neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) for patients with early-stage hormone positive breast cancer [4-6]. Local and national databases were created to evaluate the impact of these expert opinion guidelines on the management of breast cancer in the US. The ASBrS leadership established a Mastery of Breast Surgery database March 2020 to capture these changes in breast cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic for which the first 12 months of outcomes were just published. All surgeons who entered into the database reported that they had some interruption in their elective surgical schedule due to COVID-19. Surgeons in the registry were across the US with 36.7% being the in northeastern US. Mean patient age was 62 years old and 11% were African American. Telehealth was used for 6.2% of patients and 1.4% developed COVID-19. The mean invasive tumor size was 2.1 cm with 17.8% of patients being node-positive and 10.2% were triple negative [4-6]. In the Mastery registry the mean time to primary surgery was 44.5 days. NET was used in additional 24.3% of patients with hormone positive breast cancer and 30.8% of patient with DCIS. An increased percentage of patients in the northeast received NET. Genomic testing on the core biopsy occurred more frequently due to COVID-19 in patients who were node-positive. The surgeons reported that 12.4% of patients were return for another surgery later, and the majority of these surgeries were for mastectomy with or without reconstruction. For this national database a change in surgical approach was reported for 5.4% of patients with 11.5% of patients still having surgery pending at time of analysis [4-6]. In this national registry we see that breast cancer care was altered with increased use of NET and genomic testing on core biopsy.

The impact on cancer and non-cancer health outcomes may take years to fully understand. Another study captured changes across a health system in the northeast which was an epicenter of COVID-19 [7]. In this analysis 44% of patients experienced a change in treatment with 65.6% of patients with a change in treatment receiving NET and 34.4% experiencing a delay in surgery alone. For those who had a delay in surgery date due to COVID-19 the median time to surgery was 70.5 days but those receiving NET has a median time to surgery of 85 days. Patients were also given a survey Generalized Anxiety Disorder two-item (GAD-2) questionnaire which revealed that 31.2% of patients screened positive for anxiety and depression. Interestingly this was not statistically different between women who had a change in care due to COVID-19 or rates of GAD-2 positivity for women with breast cancer outside of the COVID-19 pandemic [7-8]. From multiple studies on both the local and national level, COVID-19 caused delays in breast cancer care through the guidance of national organizations and local mandates. The changes in breast cancer care did vary by location due to burden of disease and local government responses. Across the US the major changes in care seen due to the pandemic were use of NET and delay in surgical dates. The pandemic continues to affect many areas geographically today and those impacted by the current wave of COVID-19 is largely different than the first wave. From these studies we see that there were changes implemented in the care of breast cancer patients. Fortunately, women were very resilient and despite alterations in their breast cancer care there was no increase in levels of anxiety and depression. Moving forward this speaks to the importance of the breast cancer team in communicating with the patient. Although cancer care my change patients are ready to embrace this [4,6-8].

One change implemented here in the US was increased use of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for hormone positive breast cancer. This was implemented during the COVID pandemic due to difficulty in enabling many breast cancer patients to proceed to the operating room with shortages of staff and personal protective equipment [4,6-8]. Many assessments are underway to evaluate breast cancer outcomes for this cohort. Alterations in breast cancer care due to COVID-19 were rapid this will likely open up many possibilities for future directions of breast cancer care.

References