Case Report
Creative Commons, CC-BY
Reconstruction Of Anterior Thoracic Defect Following Massive Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberance (DFSP) Excision: Case Study
*Corresponding author: Hojjat Molaei, Vali-e-asr Hospital, IKHC, Bagherkhan St, Towhid Sq, Tehran, Iran Department of Plastic & reconstructive surgery, Medicine school, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Received: February 21, 2022; Published: February 28, 2022
DOI: 10.34297/AJBSR.2022.15.002141
Abstract
Background: Resection of truncal tumors have resulted in large skin defects especially in DFSP reconstruction. Thoracoabdominal perforators provide opportunity to harvest suitable flaps with minimal donor site morbidity. Superiorly based Transposition flap is a proper flap to solve large anterior thoracic skin defect challenge.
Case Presentation: A woman with superficially extended DFSP underwent wide local resection. The resulted defect was too big to reconstruct with simple solutions. At last, 2 superiorly based transposition thoracoabdominal flaps from both anterolateral sides of trunk filled the defect.
Conclusion: Transposition thoracoabdominal flap is a good reconstructive option in covering large anterior truncal defect and can be done bilaterally.
Keywords: Dermato Fibrosarcoma Protuberance; Thoracic Defect; Thoracoabdominal Flap
Introduction
Dermato fibrosarcoma protuberance (DFSP) as an uncommon tumor, with incidence of between 0.8 and 5 cases per million, was first introduced in 1890 by Taylor as a sarcoma. But now it is defined as a slow-growing infiltrative skin tumor with a high rate of local recurrence but low metastatic capacity [1]. DFSP is appears mostly on the trunk and is usually a very slowly growing subcutaneous skin tumor without epidermal invasion with fibro sarcomatous transformation. The definitive diagnosis of DFSP is made by incisional or less frequently excisional, biopsy procedure, which confirmed by specific staining [2]. Tumor tendency to local recurrence, obliges surgeons to follow strict rules in wide local resections and excising as much as possible further margins [3]. It is approved that the more margin, the less recurrence, but the minimum margin is undefined and conventional 2-3 cm margin is associated with 0% to 30% local recurrence rate [4]. Thus, most of lesions excised with safe larger margins, which resulted in larger skin defects to be reconstructed. There are numerous ways to conquer this dilemma and we decided to share our experience to demonstrate a different solution.
Case Presentation
A 72-year-old woman referred with her left anterior trunk lesion. It appeared about 1 year ago and its growth was slow and without significant symptom. She did not do any work up and ultimately visited in skin cancer clinic. Upon tissue diagnose biopsy, it was defined as DFSP. So, then plan was wide excision and reconstruction of resulted free margin defect with available adjacent tissues. The lesion excised with 3 cm margin radially and up to muscle fascia deeply, the free margines confirmed by frozen tissue diagnosis. First, a superiorly based fascio cutaneous transposition flap designed from left thoraco-abdominal area (Figure1) and transferred to defect and covered (Figure 2).
Unfortunately, after 10 days, distal forth part of flap discolored and tissue loss happened at this area. So, another transposition flap designed, and final reconstruction was done successfully (Figure 3).

Figure 3: Ultimate reconstructed upper anterior truncal defect by two superiorly based fasciocutaneous flaps.
These flaps were designed as the final scars were hidden under breasts in IMF line and did not extend beyond IMF, which satisfied patient.
Discussion
Skin graft, complex closure with undermining, fascio cutaneous flaps, musculocutaneous flaps, posterior arm flaps, omental flaps, contralateral breast flap, perforator flaps are among commonly used optional lifeboats to solve challenging huge defects of body following cancer surgeries [5].
INTEGRA® consisting of an inner dermal substitute layer and a temporary outer epidermal substance layer, is a life-saving boat in reconstruction of neonatally produced thoracic defects which body is empty of reconstructive sources and prepare a safe and acceptable background to be refurnished by skin grafts [6]. Although rarely oncoplastic surgeons encounter such situations.
When the defect is less than 5 cm, primary closure can be acceptable option, nevertheless, Z plasty or other simple reconstructive solutions should be added to mapping pool. Single or bilateral skin advancement flaps, bipediculated skin flaps, Limberg flaps and rotation flaps can be selected for the repair of the defect that occurs after large excisions [7].
According to resulted defects patients may have rib cage defects, too. This may require extensive reconstructive surgeries to compensate structural defects that can alter vital functions and deteriorate condition. But, when this cage is saved and only, we have skin and subcutaneous tissue loss, the decision changes and aesthetic point views are more highlighted. Among such decisions, again flaps are more attractive, especially some with less donor site morbidities. Pedicle myocutaneous flaps, thoracodorsal artery perforator (TDAP) flap, ICAP flap, SEAP flap, omentum flap, breast flap, andreverse abdominoplasty are some of commonly used flaps to cover larger thoracic defects [8]. Men et al. (9) (2017) had experiences with thoracic keloid treatment by using my cutaneous flaps such as rectus abdominus flap with its reliable blood supply. They illustrated effectiveness of flap in reconstruction of distal thoracic defects [9]. Always TRAM flap is a significant reconstructive operation, but abdominal wall defect following harvest, cannot tolerated by patients or may bother them. Lupon et al. (10) (2019) presented their experience in propeller perforator flaps in reconstruction of large thoracic defects based on intercostal arteries and DICAP flap in an old patient who could not tolerate significant operations and did successfully. However, there are multiple vascular variations surgeons may encounter and should manage [10]. Moreover, learning curve to be satisfied is significant. In our experience, large defects are problematic with this flap.
Thoracoabdominal (TA) flap is a rotation advancement fascio cutaneous flap which constitutes the skin and subcutaneous tissue of the anterior abdominal wall. It is based on two sets of direct perforating segmental arteries –the medial, arising from the deep epigastric arcade at the lateral border of the rectus abdominis and the lateral, arising from the lumber and subcostal arteries at the level of anterior border of the lattisimus dorsi [11]. This description defines extent of harvest and even transposition, though there are cases with transposition style [12,13], as we did. We considered by this means, a kind of body countering was achieved via reduction of lateral tissues. Our patient had bilateral superiorly base transposition flap which enhanced waist curvature. Moreover, upper limit of flap rotation was hidden under breast tissues in IMF line, that was acceptable by patient.
Conclusion
Transposition thoracoabdominal flap is a good reconstructive option in covering large anterior truncal defect and can be done bilaterally.
References
- C Serra Guillén, B Llombart, O Sanmartín (2012) Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Actas Dermosifiliogr 103:762-777.
- Philippe Saiag, Jean Jacques Grob, Celeste Lebbe, Josep Malvehy, Veronique del Marmol, et al. (2015) Diagnosis and treatment of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline. Eur J Cancer 51(17): 2604-2608.
- Barrera JC, Acosta Álvaro E y Trujillo L (2019) Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Revista Colombiana de Cancerologí 23(3): 99-109.
- Beatriz Llombart, Carlos Serra-Guillén, Carlos Monteagudo, José Antonio López Guerrero et al. (2013) Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: a comprehensive review and update on diagnosis and management. Semin Diagn Pathol 30(1): 13-28.
- Billington A, Dayicioglu D, Smith P, Kiluk J (2019) Review of Procedures for Reconstruction of Soft Tissue Chest Wall Defects Following Advanced Breast Malignancies. Cancer Control. 26(1): 1073274819827284.
- Rashid OM, Nagahashi M, Takabe K (2012) Management of massive soft tissue defects: The use of INTEGRA® artificial skin after necrotizing soft tissue infection of the chest. J Thorac Dis 4(3): 331- 335.
- Karakol P, Baş NS, Bozkurt M, Sağlam E (2021) Reconstruction of Huge Cutaneous Defects of Thoracic Large Meningomyelocele: A Technical Note. Bagcilar Med Bull 6(2): 210-215.
- Salo J, Tukiainen E (2020) Flap reconstruction of the chest wall after oncologic resection. Curr Chall Thorac Surg 2: 5.
- Men QC, Liu S, Song KX, Wang YB, Lin Z, el al. (2017) Reconstruction of a large defect of the female chest following keloid excision with use of the rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap. Plast Aesthet Res 4: 86-91.
- E Lupon, A G Lellouch, F Deilhes, B Chaput, C Berthier (2019) Reconstruction of a dorsal thoracic wall defect with a dorsal intercostal artery perforator flap after removal of a bulky cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: a case report. J Med Case Reports 13(1): 294.
- Das DK (2013) Choudhury UC. “Thoracoabdominal Flap”- A Simple Flap for Skin and Soft Tissue Cover Following Radical Surgery for Locally Advanced Breast Cancer-The Malaysian Experience. International Journal of Collaborative Research on Internal Medicine & Public Health 5(6): 398-406.
- Suryanarayana Deo SV, Mishra A, Shukla NK, Sandeep B (2019) Thoracoabdominal Flap: a Simple Flap for Covering Large Post-mastectomy Soft Tissue Defects in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer. Indian J Surg Oncol 10(3): 494-498.
- Kyunghyun Min, Eun Jeong Choi, Yeon Hoon Lee, Jin Sup Eom, Byung Ho Son (2019) Single vertical incision thoracoabdominal flap for chest wall reconstruction following mastectomy of locally advanced breast cancer. Ann Surg Treat Res 97(4): 168-175.