Mini Review Creative Commons, CC-BY
Spirituality in the Realm of the Microbes
*Corresponding author: Rodney R Dietert, Professor Emeritus of Immunotoxicology, Cornell University, Mailing address: c/o 10035 E. Tristan Dr., Hereford, AZ 85615 USA.
Received: April 10, 2024; Published: April 16, 2024
DOI: 10.34297/AJBSR.2024.22.002927
Abstract
Earth is first and foremost a planet of microorganisms. They are the most widely distributed and prevalent lifeform on our planet. The microbes are cognitive, sentient, quantum, and exquisitely connected beings that inhabit virtually every niche above, on the surface of, and in the bowels of planet earth. Furthermore, they bind together virtually all of earth’s complex natural life as holobionts where microbes are most often in the majority and are major controllers of life’s functions across the lifespan. The idea of informative, informational, and even spiritual “gut instincts” invariably directs our attention to a region of the human holobiont body that is both open to the external environment and predominated by the gut microbiome. The well-functioning holobiont is a form of Self-Organizing Collective (SOC). No authority is required. In prior publications, we considered the significance of the wired and wireless-connected Internet of Microbes (IOM) as well as the tradition of ancient healing tools that were recently shown to affect both microbial populations and holobiont microbiomes. Here, we build upon this literature to consider not only hologenome theory and the ancestral and natural traditions that support humanity’s wellbeing, but also primarily, human holobiont spirituality during our time in the realm of the microbes.
Keywords: Spirituality, Internet of Microbes (IOM), Microbiome, Hologenome, Gut instincts, Microbial realm
Abbreviations: IOM: Internet of Microbes; SOC: Self-organizing collective; NSAIDs: Non-steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs
Introduction
For humans, our fundamental form is predominately microbial in nature [1]. Microbial cells are our body’s slight majority and we carry an overwhelming majority of microbial genes [2,3]. This fact allows us to shift perspective from a pinnacled species that is separate from all other lifeforms on earth toward a distinctly grounded view that we as human holobionts are a microcosm of life on earth [1]. While a normal reaction to this 21st century change in understanding that we are not alone within our own body could be humbling, it is also massively uplifting to know that we have functional capacities greater than the sum of the parts and, in many cases, beyond our wildest dreams [4]. As human holobionts, when we honor, protect, and embrace our own body, we better connect with, benefit from, and honor life on earth.
This is a particularly important change in human understanding in part because how humans are viewed can fall into at least two different theological camps: the perfect single-species human or the intended multi-species human. The question within Christian theology appears to be: which human version is in the image of God? In one camp, humans could be routinely demonized by religious and other authorities when carrying a disease now known to occur as a result of infection (i.e., microbes as part of germ theory) [5]. Al-Attas Bradford [5] points out that demonizing microbes can provide religious comfort for this camp. Of course, the problem is that labeling humans with infections as having fallen from grace requires a lack of or incomplete recognition of current multi-species holobiont reality. As Al-Attas Bradford [5] points out, the single species camp perspective with demonized microbes is convenient because it avoids potentially reformative, science-meets-religion changes concerning the historical image of God. Such a convenient attitude of demonized microbes even prevailed during the recent Covid-19 pandemic [6-10]. But according to Al-Attas Bradford [5] there is also a second pro-microbial Christian theological camp. An alternative view of humanity is that everyone is filled with microbes, in fact trillions of them, and that a holobiont-honored body connected with earth’s other holobionts and vast microbial populations is quite acceptable. Of course, host resistance science suggests that holobionts with robust microbiomes are far more likely to avoid germ-produced infections through effective colonization resistance [11-13]. The question then is: will the ongoing microbiome revolution help to move beyond a theological dogma where “germs” are evil and sanitizers are our savior?
In this mini-review article, we discuss a variety of recent perspectives on various topics regarding humans with microbes (the human holobiont or human superorganisms) and focus on the spiritual implications of being mainly-microbial holobionts living in the realm of microbes. We conclude with a view that increased microbe-based holobiont functionality, spiritual awareness, and the pursuit of a seamlessly connected life are a core part of humanity.
Embracing and Utilizing the Cognitive, Quantum Nature of Our Microbes
Primarily during the past decade, several researchers described the remarkable functional capabilities of microbes such as bacteria. This was recently reviewed by us [4]. Bacteria and other microorganisms are sentient beings possessed with such traits as consciousness, cognition, memory, wired and wireless interkingdom connectivity, shape shifting, holding multiple quantum states, directed sensing and mobility, gene editing capabilities, and exquisite energy collection, transfer, and production capabilities as well as being masters of environmental sensing and chemical recycling. They are a front-line sensing and defense network for earth as well as for the human body. We previously discussed that going inside via meditation and other contemplative practices can enable us to better connect with the Internet of Microbes via our own human microbiome [9]. This is not a new concept but rather can be traced back to ancient cultures and healing practices such as the Shamanic traditions of the Amerindians [14,15]. The fact that mindfulness meditation can produce a demonstrable shift in gut microbiome composition [16] reflects the power of our connection to our microbes, and the fact that we are functionally and possibly spiritually inseparable when whole. This raises the question how whole, human holobiont cognition, memories, communication, intuition, knowledge, and spiritual connection compares with that bounded by the limits of the previously-conceived, single-species human?
In fact, the idea of holobiont wholeness was presented by us in two early microbiome papers. The first paper argued that the best predictive biomarker surrounding birth (a biosemiotics indicator) of a baby’s future health trajectory was a measure of microbiome completeness [17]. A second paper introduced the concept that a lack of effective seeding of the microbiome at birth was the equivalent of a birth defect [18], although a potentially correctable birth defect. In light of recent findings about microbe capabilities, failure in microbiome completeness might be expected to affect not only human functionality and wellness but also spiritual connectivity and intuitiveness.
Table 1 illustrates the interconnectedness between human holobiont existence, earth’s microbial populations and functions, and human holobiont spirituality [1,5,9,10,14,15,19-49] (Table 1).
Table 1 illustrates the important evolution of thinking concerning not only the fundamental and remarkable nature of microbes, but also the emergence of a spiritual realization regarding the whole human. No longer will our microbes be excluded from theological considerations and spiritual contemplation. Instead, human holobionts in our full multi-species glory can even better walk the spiritual path in physical health and wellness and with full composite-mind contemplative awareness.
Figure 1 depicts the newly emerging concepts and language surrounding the realm of the microbes and human holobiont spirituality. Importantly, many different research disciplines have contributed pieces to this view of human holobiont spirituality (Figure 1).
The Symbiont as the Image of God
Seeing spirituality arise from the physical union of otherwise sterile humans with co-partner microbes is not a hand waving exercise. It is the recognition that the creator God is much more than just sterile humans and many of God’s other creations can be found in the microbe-rich, multi-species us. Among the most comprehensive and persuasive tenets for a symbiotic image of God is made by Aminah Al-Attas Bradford, Ph.D. [39]. In her monumental work Symbiotic Grace: Holobiont Theology in the Age of the Microbe, Dr. Al-Attas Bradford makes a strong case for the holobiontic imago dei (image of God) where the imago dei and the microbiome are fully compatible. Several points from the monograph support this tenet:
a. Our microbes make us human inside and beyond and bring more of God’s creations from nature into our bodies.
b. Willingly accepting our microbes as part of us, rewires anthropology shedding homogeneity, division and separation and embraces a multispecies plural way of being and knowing.
c. The image of God is great and needs to be that way. As a solobiont, single-species humans do not have the capacity to reflect the greatness of God that we must do since we are created in God’s image.
We need to be multitudinous. Al-Attas Bradford [39] goes on to discuss how the human holobiont microcosm is not bounded by skin meaning there is no longer an “I” and a “Thou.” She reminds us that there is no isolated self. We are essentially a fluid microcosm of nature with microbes entering and exiting and microbial genes flowing via a river running though us [39]. The monograph considers a myriad of benchmark historic theological thinking and shows how humans as a more comprehensive reflection of God’s creations across nature is consistent with much of the prior thinking. One of Al-Attas Bradford’s closing concepts is that holobiont theology has a huge silver lining: it has the capacity to “teach us to see ourselves as never just ourselves” [39]. Symbiotic grace is both a blessing and a reality in the realm of the microbes.
Other religious and scientific scholars have weighed in on the concept that the human holobiont exists because of a beneficial creative design process. How did ancient archaea contribute to present day eukaryotic cells as an institutionalized energy source, mitochondria? At least one key merger involved ancient archaea [50]. But it is interesting that the original events may have been between two different kinds of prokaryotes. Romero, et al., [51] pointed to the Asgard superphyla of archaea as one of the prokaryote players in fusion and fission processes. Genetically robust prokaryotes appear to have nudged us along a eukaryotic-symbiotic timeline.
In his book This Sacred Life [52], Norman Wirzba discusses the fact that microbes make critical metabolites needed by human holobionts and that we, as holobionts, have been provided with an ecological pharmacy because of our microbial co-partners [52]. Our inherent multi-species nature allows us to ascend to new heights of form, function, and spirituality.
In the following sections, we describe the significant danger that has existed and continues to exist today concerning authority-promoted lifestyles, products, and activities that result in microbiome degradation and mind-body-spirit weakening.
Considering Microbiome Destruction as Separation from Spirit
In Isaiah 59 verse 2 of the Bible the idea of sin is introduced suggesting that iniquities can separate us from our God by building barriers that impair communication. This raises the possibility that microbiome depletion and degradation in the human holobiont as well as that in the surrounding environment (e.g., the urban built environment) may result in not only human mental and physical disruption/illness but also a loss of communication capacity via the IOM. In the book The Human Superorganism [1], one of this present article’s authors (RRD) posed the question whether at some point, benevolent ancestral humans invited earth’s microorganisms to become squatters in the body in forming the human holobiont or whether the reverse is true: microbes “created” a most wonderful vessel for their future, the human holobiont. This theme was also introduced in a comparison of the earth-connected human superorganism vs. the transhumanistic machine [53]. From this vantage point, the greatest sin might be the separation of the human holobiont from microbes and as an outcome, from both nature and each other. We become an island depleted both physically and in spirit when we are separated from microbes. This sheds new light on lifestyles. The reality is that until recently we humans were not generally aware of the importance of our microbes. The ongoing microbiome revolution including both microbiome first medicine as well as a return to natural healing strategies has elevated awareness of the significance of the human microbiome surrounding birth and early nurturing. The admonition from Jesus Christ presented in the Gospel of Matthew to come as little children to enter the realm of heaven may give us a new perspective with regard to the critical steps of seeding and feeding the newborn’s microbiome.
A particularly intriguing part of Biblical history with microbiological implications has been discussed by prominent biblical scholar Mauro Biglino. As listed in Table 1, Chapter 6, section 5 of his book “Gods of the Bible” [36], Biglino covers the anointing procedures required for humans such as Enoch to come into contact with the Elohim. The procedures were quite detailed and had both bathing and scrubbing protocols plus various treatments with a list of quite specific amounts of particular herbs, chemicals, perfumes, and spices. Of note, the ancient text researcher concluded that these treatments were not ritualistic but rather were a practical antimicrobial protocol necessary to significantly deplete the human of holobiont-associated microbes. As discussed in the next section, human microbiome depletion did not end with direct human-Elohim interactions. Instead, it has been a major outcome of the past century of Westernized modern life (e.g., medical, pharmaceutical, agricultural, and chemical innovations.)
An Attack on the Human Holobiont and Ecological Microbes is an Attack on Humanity
If microbiome wholeness is both biologically and spiritually important, then it is important to consider precisely how humanity reached such a massive level of microbiome degradation. Importantly, it was not through what might be termed “informed consent.” A lack of public microbiome education was a problem until recently, but a larger problem was the pursuit of microbiome destroying practices in most aspects of human life. A first red flag was presented by Dr. Martin Blaser [54] in his landmark book Missing Microbes. There, overuse of antibiotics was identified as a major issue [54]. But the reality is that the entire spectrum of institutional public health produced a primary outcome of microbial destruction [reviewed in 55]. As described by Dietert and Silbergeld [56], the fundamental problem was that safety testing as designed and regulated by the government was not designed to protect the microbiome [56], and there are many sources of authority-approved drugs and chemicals that can damage the microbiome [57]. The transgression by authorities ranged from purportedly safe and effective, approved common drugs that were subsequently shown to be microbial toxins (e.g., NSAIDs and proton pump inhibitors [58,59]) to the equally approved microbe killers among massively-distributed agricultural chemicals (e.g., pesticides [60]), processed food (e.g., food emulsifiers [61]), household chemicals (e.g., cleaning products and personal care products [62,63]) and infant products (bisphenol A in baby bottles and nipples [64,65]). A conclusion is that what might well be the greatest sin of erecting spiritual barriers was not a choice by humanity but rather was thrust upon an unsuspecting holobiont populace.
Conclusion
While there is much we are still learning about planet earth, it is clear that our planet is, above all, a realm of microorganisms. Microbes are the predominate planetary lifeform, and they are pervasive among more complex organisms (e.g., holobionts). For the newborn baby, a healthier life is one filled with majority microbial co-partners forming a SOC intelligence with tangible benefits, physiological systems programmed for effective function, longevity, colonization resistance that is our front line of defense, useful circadian clocks, and a capacity to overcome fear when needed. Ancient healing practices affect microbial populations. Sound, light, electric, and magnetic frequencies and fields affect the microbes. In reality they are our sentinels.
We are connected to earth’s microbes in other holobionts and ecosystem communities via the IOM. The information flows microbially though nanowires and wireless communication. It is there for the taking once we are made aware of and focus on this network. When the spiritual meets the biological/microbiological, “gut instincts” can be seen as part of spiritual guidance for the human holobiont. Our immersion in microbes can be seen as a form of spiritual medicine [66].
As is shown in Table 1 and visually represented in Figure 1, the microbiome revolution has ushered in many changes in our perspectives regarding the human body and human functional and spiritual life. Part of this shift in perspective is not only viewing microbes as technology-laden, sentient, co-partner beings but also in recognizing microbes as central to humanity’s divine connection to spirit. Theologians from many different backgrounds and faiths are now traveling the path of microbe-inclusive spirituality (Table 1). This is epitomized by the work of Dr. Amimah Al-Attas Bradford [39].
This mini-review article is intended to:
a. Facilitate a deeper appreciation of humanity and its multi-species nature and
b. Illustrate that as multi-species beings, we readily connect with spirit and grace thanks in large part to our microbes.
Author Contributions
R.R.D. performed much of the research for the table and the figure and drafted the first version of the manuscript. A portion of the spiritual-related research was contributed by J.M.D. who also edited the manuscript. Both authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Dietert R (2016) The Human Superorganism. Dutton Penguin Random House: 352.
- Gilbert JA, Blaser MJ, Caporaso JG, Jansson JK, Lynch SV, et al. (2018) Current understanding of the human microbiome. Nat Med 24(4): 392-400.
- Sender R, Fuchs S, Milo R (2016) Revised estimates for the number of human and bacteria cells in the body. PLoS Biol 14(8): e1002533.
- Dietert RR, Dietert JM (2023) The Embodied Microbiome. Am J Biomed Sci Res 20(3): 324-339.
- Al Attas Bradford A (2022) Religion, Animals, and the Theological Anthropology of Microbes in the Pandemicene. Religions 13(12): 1146.
- Bardosh K, De Figueiredo A, Gur Arie R, Jamrozik E, Doidge J, et al. (2022) The unintended consequences of COVID-19 vaccine policy: why mandates, passports and restrictions may cause more harm than good. BMJ Global Health 7(5): e008684.
- Pugh J, Savulescu J, Brown RC, Wilkinson D (2022) The unnaturalistic fallacy: COVID-19 vaccine mandates should not discriminate against natural immunity. J Med Ethic 48(6): 371-377.
- Sandlund J, Duriseti R, Ladhani SN, Stuart K, Noble J, et al. (2024) Child mask mandates for COVID-19: a systematic review. Arch Dis Childhood 109(3): e2-e2.
- Dietert RR, Dietert JM (2023) Using the Internet of Microbes to Survive the Assault on the Human Microbiome. Amer J Biomed Sci & Res 19(1): 71-76.
- Dietert RR, Dietert JM (2023) The Human Superorganism: Using Microbes for Freedom vs. Fear. Appl Microbiol 3(3): 883-905.
- Pamer EG (2016) Resurrecting the intestinal microbiota to combat antibiotic-resistant pathogens. Science 352(6285): 535-538.
- Caballero Flores G, Pickard JM Núñez G (2023) Microbiota-mediated colonization resistance: mechanisms and regulation. Nat Rev Microbiol 21(6): 347-360.
- Dietert RR (2018) A focus on microbiome completeness and optimized colonization resistance in neonatology. NeoReviews 19(2): e78-e88.
- Giraldo Herrera CE (2018) Shamanic microscopy: cellular souls, microbial spirits. Anthropology of Consciousness 29(1): 8-43.
- Giraldo Herrera CE (2018) Microbes and other shamanic beings. Palgrave Macmillan: 274.
- Dietert JM, Dietert RR (2024) Ancient and Alternative Healing Tools for Microbe Management. Am J Biomed Sci & Res 21(5): 475-486.
- Dietert R, Dietert J (2012) The completed self: an immunological view of the human-microbiome superorganism and risk of chronic diseases. Entropy 14: 2036-2065.
- Dietert RR (2014) The microbiome in early life: self‐completion and microbiota protection as health priorities. Birth Defects Res Part B: Devel Reproduct Toxicol 101(4): 333-340.
- Dunn AK, Handelsman J (2002) Toward an understanding of microbial communities through analysis of communication networks. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 81(1-4): 565-574.
- Slijepcevic P, Wickramasinghe NC (2020) An internet of microbes straddling the cosmos. Adv Genet 106: 109-117.
- Wani AK, Akhtar N, Sher F, Navarrete AA, Américo Pinheiro JH, et al. (2022) Microbial adaptation to different environmental conditions: molecular perspective of evolved genetic and cellular systems. Arch Microbiol 204(2): 144.
- Baluška F, Reber AS, Miller Jr WB (2022) Cellular sentience as the primary source of biological order and evolution. Biosystems 218: 104694.
- Arcadi E, Rizzo C, Calogero R, Sciutteri V, Fabiano F, et al. (2023) Microbial communities inhabiting shallow hydrothermal vents as sentinels of acidification processes. Front Microbiol 14: 1233893.
- Egidi E, Coleine C, Delgado Baquerizo M, Singh BK (2023) Assessing critical thresholds in terrestrial microbiomes. Nat Microbiol 8(12): 2230-2233.
- Bordenstein SR, Theis KR (2015) Host biology in light of the microbiome: ten principles of holobionts and hologenomes. PLoS Biol 13(8): e1002226.
- Westerhoff HV, Brooks AN, Simeonidis E, García Contreras R, He F, et al. (2014) Macromolecular networks and intelligence in microorganisms. Front Microbiol 5: 379.
- Zilber Rosenberg I, Rosenberg E (2021) Microbial-driven genetic variation in holobionts. FEMS Microbiol Rev 45(6): fuab022.
- Palacios García I, Mhuireach GA, Grasso Cladera A, Cryan JF, Parada FJ, et al. (2022) The 4E approach to the human microbiome: Nested interactions between the gut‐brain/body system within natural and built environments. BioEssays 44(6): 2100249.
- Miller WB, Baluška F, Reber AS (2023) A revised central dogma for the 21st century: All biology is cognitive information processing. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 182: 34-38.
- Morais R (2023) Rethinking Intelligence Beyond the Anthropic: Pervasive Intelligence, Entangled Cognition and the Logic of the Included Middle. Artificial Intelligence and Human Mediation 105.
- Slijepcevic P (2024) Principles of cognitive biology and the concept of biocivilisations. Biosystems 235: 105109.
- Miller Jr WB, Baluška F, Torday JS (2020) Cellular senomic measurements in cognition-based evolution. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 156: 20-33.
- Heylighen F (2013) Self-organization in Communicating Groups: the emergence of coordination, shared references and collective intelligence. In Complexity perspectives on language, communication and society: 117-149.
- Surowiecki J (2005) The wisdom of crowds. Anchor Aug 16.
- Singh BK, Liu H, Trivedi P (2020) Eco‐holobiont: a new concept to identify drivers of host‐associated microorganisms. Environ Microbiol 22(2): 564-567.
- Biglino M (2023) Gods of the Bible. Tuthi, Tornio Italy.
- Paquete CM, Rosenbaum MA, Bañeras L, Rotaru AE, Puig S, et al. (2022) Let’s chat: Communication between electroactive microorganisms. Bioresource Technol 347: 126705.
- Kunnen M, Carlson C (2017) Deeply connected to God's good world, the human microbiome. Christian Scholar's Rev 46(2): 113-125.
- Bradford AA (2020) Symbiotic Grace: Holobiont Theology in the Age of the Microbe. Duke University ProQuest Dissertations Publishing: 370.
- Hill AM (2020) The other within: Rethinking theological anthropology in light of the microbiome. Christian Scholar's Rev 50(1): 39-59.
- Davison A (2020) Christian Doctrine and Biological Mutualism: Some Explorations in Systematic and Philosophical Theology. Theol Sci 18(2): 258-78.
- Malcolm H (2023) Body Without End: Biological Mutualism and the Body of Christ. International J Systemat Theol 25(2): 312-328.
- Janiga OSB D (2023) On the Resurrection of Microbes: An Eco-Christological Approach to the Resurrection. Obsculta 16(1): 124-141.
- Cui X, Zhou S, Xia G, Chen J, Jiang L, et al. (2021) A multispecies probiotic accelerates fear extinction and inhibits relapse in mice: Role of microglia. Neuropharmacol 193: 108613.
- Maeng LY, Beumer A (2023) Never fear, the gut bacteria are here: Estrogen and gut microbiome-brain axis interactions in fear extinction. Int J Psychophysiol 189: 66-75.
- Ritz NL, Brocka M, Butler MI, Cowan CS, Barrera Bugueño C, et al. (2024) Social anxiety disorder-associated gut microbiota increases social fear. Proc Natl Acad Sci 121(1): e2308706120.
- Panchin AY, Tuzhikov AI, Panchin YV (2014) Midichlorians-the biomeme hypothesis: is there a microbial component to religious rituals?. Biol Direct 9: 14.
- Mateo Dieste JL (2015) Spirits are like microbes: Islamic revival and the definition of morality in Moroccan exorcism. Contemp Islam 9(1): 45-63.
- Rinaldo K (2022) Can microbes save us from ourselves?. Antennae: The Journal of Nature in Visual Culture 58: 12-16.
- Baum B, Baum DA (2020) The merger that made us. BMC Biol 18(1): 1-4.
- Romero H, Aguilar PS, Graña M, Langleib M, Gudiño V, et al. (2024) Membrane fusion and fission during eukaryogenesis. Curr Opin Cell Biol 86: 102321.
- Wirzba N (2021) This Sacred Life. Cambridge University Press: 286.
- Dietert RR (2022) The Earth-Connected Human Superorganism Vs. The Machine. Am J Biomed Sci & Res 15(6): 653-662.
- Blaser MJ (2014) Missing microbes: how the overuse of antibiotics is fueling our modern plagues. Henry Holt and Company LLC, New York, NY, USA: 288.
- Dietert RR (2021) Microbiome first approaches to rescue public health and reduce human suffering. Biomedicines 9(11): 1581.
- Dietert RR, Silbergeld EK (2015) Biomarkers for the 21st century: listening to the microbiome. Toxicol Sci 144(2): 208-216.
- Bhardwaj G, Riadi Y, Afzal M, Bansal P, Kaur H, et al. (2024) The hidden threat: Environmental toxins and their effects on gut microbiota. Pathology Res Practice 255: 155173.
- Rogers MA, Aronoff DM (2016) The influence of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on the gut microbiome. Clin Microbiol Infect 22(2): e1-178.
- Imhann F, Bonder MJ, Vila AV, Fu J, Mujagic Z, et al. (2016) Proton pump inhibitors affect the gut microbiome. Gut 65(5): 740-748.
- Gama J, Neves B, Pereira A (2022) Chronic effects of dietary pesticides on the gut microbiome and neurodevelopment. Front Microbiol 13: 931440.
- Salame C, Srour B, Viennois E, Huybrechts I, Hercberg S, et al. (2023) Food emulsifiers and risk of type 2 diabetes: results from the prospective NutriNet-Santé Eur J Public Health 33(Supplement_2): ckad160-1248.
- Parks J, Takaro TK (2020) Exposure to cleaning products and childhood asthma: more than just a link?. Expert Rev of Respir Med 14(12): 1185-1188.
- Khalil M, Iqbal M, Turan V, Tauqeer HM, Farhad M, et al. (2022) Household chemicals and their impact. Chapter 11 in Environmental micropollutants: 201-232.
- Lopez Moreno A, Cerk K, Rodrigo L, Suarez A, Aguilera M, et al. (2024) Bisphenol A exposure affects specific gut taxa and drives microbiota dynamics in childhood obesity. Msystems 9(3): e0095723.
- Al Sabbagh JK, Abdulwahid HH, Habeeb ZT, Al Khafaji NM, Jawad RA, et al. (2020) Bisphenol A (BPA) the silent assassin of modern life. AIP Conf Proc 2290(1): 020032.
- Villoldo A (2015) One spirit medicine: Ancient ways to ultimate wellness. Hay House: 209.